nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 06, v.41 1710-1722
肠道病毒D68型VP1-N90K突变增强其在乳鼠感染致病力研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家疾病预防控制局公共卫生人才培养支持项目(项目号:GJJKJ-2024-ZY); 传染病溯源预警与智能决策全国重点实验室(NITFID)资助项目(项目号:ZDGWNLJS25-36),题目:未知及新发病原体监测及预测预警技术研究; 国家重点研发计划(项目号:2021YFC2302003),题目:病毒监测网络数据标准及数据平台建设~~
邮箱(Email): yongzhang75@sina.com;
DOI: 10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.250320
摘要:

肠道病毒D68(Enterovirus D68, EV-D68)与儿童严重呼吸道感染和急性弛缓性脊髓炎(Acute flaccid myelitis, AFM)相关,但其导致瘫痪的分子机制尚未阐明。为深入探究这一机制,本研究以2018年从儿童患者体内分离的一株EV-D68(D2基因亚型)为亲本株,通过构建ICR小鼠适应性株,成功获得了P0代至P9代的系列传代毒株。经全基因组测序分析,显示VP1-N90K是唯一位于病毒与受体结合区的位点,也是P2代与P4代毒株之间的唯一氨基酸差异位点。体内体外实验显示VP1-N90K突变可导致小鼠出现更强的致病性和细胞病变效应(Cytopathic effect, CPE)。为揭示VP1-N90K突变增强病毒致病性的分子基础,通过分子模拟技术分析发现VP1-N90K突变显著增强与宿主受体的结合亲和力。综上,本研究得出核心结论:VP1-N90K是增强EV-D68神经毒力的关键突变。该突变通过优化VP1与宿主受体的结合能力,显著促进病毒在宿主细胞表面的吸附、内化过程,以及在神经细胞内的复制效率,最终导致AFM瘫痪表型的发生。本研究结果为EV-D68致病机制的深入解析提供了关键实验依据,也为针对性抗病毒策略(如靶向VP1受体结合域的药物研发)的制定奠定了重要基础。

Abstract:

Enterovirus D68(EV-D68) is associated with severe respiratory illness and acute flaccid myelitis(AFM) in children, yet the molecular mechanism driving paralysis remains poorly defined. In this study, an EV-D68 D2-subclade clinical isolate obtained from a pediatric patient in 2018 was used as the parental strain to generate a mouse-adapted virus through serial passage in ICR neonatal mice, yielding viral populations from passages P0 to P9. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that VP1-N90K was the only amino acid substitution within the receptor-binding region and the sole difference between P2 and P4 viral populations. In vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrated that the VP1-N90K mutation significantly increased viral pathogenicity in neonatal mice and induced stronger cytopathic effects in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma and RD rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Molecular simulation analysis further showed that VP1-N90K markedly enhanced the binding affinity of VP1 to its host receptors, including sialic acid and MFSD6. Collectively, these findings identify VP1-N90K as a critical determinant of EV-D68 neurovirulence. By strengthening VP1– receptor interactions, this mutation promotes viral attachment, internalization, and replication within neuronal cells, ultimately contributing to AFM-like paralysis. This work provides mechanistic insight into EV-D68-induced neuropathogenesis and informs the development of targeted antiviral interventions, including agents directed against the VP1 receptor-binding interface.

参考文献

[1] Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. Acute flaccid myelitis:something old and something new[J]. mBio,2019, 10(2):e00521-19. DOI:10. 1128/mBio. 00521-19.

[2]周振威,王涛.人肠道病毒EV-D68的研究进展[J].病毒学报,2017, 33(2):279-283. DOI:10. 13242/j.cnki. bingduxuebao. 003135.

[3] Schieble JH, Fox VL, Lennette EH. A probable new human picornavirus associated with respiratory diseases[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 1967, 85(2):297-310. DOI:10. 1093/oxfordjournals. aje. a120693.

[4] Sejvar JJ, Lopez AS, Cortese MM, et al. Acute flaccid myelitis in the United States, August-December 2014:results of nationwide surveillance[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2016, 63(6):737-745. DOI:10. 1093/cid/ciw372.

[5] Van Haren K, Ayscue P, Waubant E, et al. Acute flaccid myelitis of unknown etiology in California, 2012-2015[J]. JAMA, 2015, 314(24):2663-2671. DOI:10. 1001/jama. 2015. 17275.

[6]尹璐,于晓方,张伟.人肠道病毒D68研究新进展[J].病毒学报,2018, 34(6):936-944. DOI:10. 13242/j. cnki. bingduxuebao. 003427.

[7] Messacar K, Asturias EJ, Hixon AM, et al.Enterovirus D68 and acute flaccid myelitis-evaluating the evidence for causality[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2018, 18(8):e239-e247. DOI:10. 1016/S1473-3099(18)30094-X.

[8] Hixon AM, Frost J, Rudy MJ, et al. Understanding enterovirus D68-induced neurologic disease:a basic science review[J]. Viruses, 2019, 11(9):821. DOI:10. 3390/v11090821.

[9] Sun J, Hu XY, Yu XF. Current understanding of human enterovirus D68[J]. Viruses, 2019, 11(6):490. DOI:10. 3390/v11060490.

[10]Liu X, Li H, Li Z, et al. MFSD6 is an entry receptor for respiratory enterovirus D68[J]. Cell Host Microbe,2025, 33(2):267-278. e4. DOI:10. 1016/j.chom. 2024. 12. 015.

[11]Varanese L, Xu L, Peters CE, et al. MFSD6 is an entry receptor for enterovirus D68[J]. Nature, 2025,641(8065):1268-1275. DOI:10. 1038/s41586-025-08908-0.

[12]Elrick MJ, Pekosz A, Duggal P. Enterovirus D68molecular and cellular biology and pathogenesis[J]. J Biol Chem, 2021, 296:100317. DOI:10. 1016/j.jbc. 2021. 100317.

[13]Liu Y, Sheng J, Baggen J, et al. Sialic acid-dependent cell entry of human enterovirus D68[J]. Nat Commun,2015, 6:8865. DOI:10. 1038/ncomms9865.

[14]Shi Y, Liu Y, Wu Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology and recombination of enterovirus D68 in China[J].Infect Genet Evol, 2023, 115:105512. DOI:10. 1016/j. meegid. 2023. 105512.

[15]Brown DM, Hixon AM, Oldfield LM, et al.Contemporary circulating enterovirus D68 strains have acquired the capacity for viral entry and replication in human neuronal cells[J]. mBio, 2018, 9(5):e01954-18. DOI:10. 1128/mBio. 01954-18.

[16]Leser JS, Frost JL, Wilson CJ, et al. VP1 is the primary determinant of neuropathogenesis in a mouse model of enterovirus D68 acute flaccid myelitis[J]. J Virol, 2024, 98(7):e00397-24. DOI:10. 1128/jvi. 00397-24.

[17]肖梦怡,韩振志,路环环,等.肠道病毒D68型流行基因型高灵敏通用型Real-time RT-PCR检测方法建立及应用[J].病毒学报,2025, 41(3):625-633. DOI:10. 13242/j. cnki. bingduxuebao. 250123.

[18]Sooksawasdi Na Ayudhya S, Meijer A, Bauer L, et al.Enhanced enterovirus D68 replication in neuroblastoma cells is associated with a cell culture-adaptive amino acid substitution in VP1[J]. mSphere, 2020, 5(6):e00941-20. DOI:10. 1128/mSphere. 00941-20.

[19]Wei W, Guo H, Chang J, et al. ICAM-5/telencephalin is a functional entry receptor for enterovirus D68[J].Cell Host Microbe, 2016, 20(5):631-641. DOI:10. 1016/j. chom. 2016. 09. 013.

[20]Baggen J, Thibaut HJ, Staring J, et al. Enterovirus D68 receptor requirements unveiled by haploid genetics[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2016, 113(5):1399-1404. DOI:10. 1073/pnas. 1524498113.

[21]Hu Y, Musharrafieh R, Zheng M, et al. Enterovirus D68 antivirals:past, present, and future[J]. ACS Infect Dis, 2020, 6(7):1572-1586. DOI:10. 1021/acsinfecdis. 0c00120.

[22]Esposito S, Bosis S, Niesters H, et al. Enterovirus D68 infection[J]. Viruses, 2015, 7(11):6043-6050.DOI:10. 3390/v7112925.

[23]Cassidy H, Poelman R, Knoester M, et al. Enterovirus D68–the new polio[J]. Front Microbiol, 2018, 9:2677. DOI:10. 3389/fmicb. 2018. 02677.

[24]Messacar K, Abzug MJ, Dominguez SR. The emergence of enterovirus-D68[J]. Microbiol Spectr,2016, 4(3). DOI:10. 1128/microbiolspec. EI10-0018-2016.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.250320

中图分类号:R373.2

引用信息:

[1]段伟,李冀琛,李慧洁,等.肠道病毒D68型VP1-N90K突变增强其在乳鼠感染致病力研究[J].病毒学报,2025,41(06):1710-1722.DOI:10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.250320.

基金信息:

国家疾病预防控制局公共卫生人才培养支持项目(项目号:GJJKJ-2024-ZY); 传染病溯源预警与智能决策全国重点实验室(NITFID)资助项目(项目号:ZDGWNLJS25-36),题目:未知及新发病原体监测及预测预警技术研究; 国家重点研发计划(项目号:2021YFC2302003),题目:病毒监测网络数据标准及数据平台建设~~

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文