nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 05, v.36 865-870
采用风险矩阵评估俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦两种蜱传病毒性传染病输入我国风险水平
基金项目(Foundation): 国家科技重大专项课题(项目号:2018ZX10101002-003-004),题目:俄罗斯、中亚西亚重要传染病输入和监测预警技术研究~~
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.003764
投稿时间: 2020-01-15
投稿日期(年): 2020
修回时间: 2020-03-08
终审时间: 2020-06-24
终审日期(年): 2020
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2020-06-24
出版时间: 2020-06-24
网络发布时间: 2020-06-24
移动端阅读
摘要:

我国提出的"一带一路"倡议得到越来越多国家的响应,为了防止传染病输入我国并造成本地传播,需要评估各种传染病跨境传播的可能。本文采用德尔菲法和风险矩阵相结合的分析方法,选择20名长期从事传染病防治的专家填写咨询问卷,评价俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦两国克里米亚-刚果出血热(Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever,CCHF)、蜱传脑炎(Tick-borne encephalitis,TBE)输入我国的风险水平(Risk,R)。第二轮咨询结果显示,两个国家、两种疾病的输入风险可能性(Possibility,P)、后果严重性(Consequence severity,S)评分的标准差均较第一轮咨询小,提示专家意见分歧变小;第二轮专家咨询哈萨克斯坦CCHF输入风险可能性明显小于第一轮(P=0.017),其他各指标评分的均值均未高于第一轮,提示风险偏好并未随着咨询次数增加而增大;肯德尔和谐系数(Kendall’s W)为0.223,较第一轮小幅上升(0.199);两种蜱传疾病在第二轮风险矩阵中的风险水平处于低~中等范围,较第一轮(低~极高)趋于集中,第二轮咨询哈萨克斯坦CCHF输入我国风险水平平均秩次低于第一轮(P=0.027),其他无统计学差异;两轮咨询俄罗斯TBE输入我国风险可能性均高于哈萨克斯坦(P第一轮=0.008、P第二轮<0.001),第二轮风险水平平均秩次高于哈萨克斯坦(P=0.014)。以上结果已对实际工作和研究方法具有借鉴作用,终止咨询。本研究提示,我国面临TBE、CCHF输入风险虽未达高等级水平,但仍需保持适度的警惕性。

Abstract:

The Belt and Road initiative set forward by our country has been responded by more and more countries. In order to prevent the imported infectious diseases into China which will cause local spread,we need to assess the possibility of crossing border spread of various infectious diseases. In this paper,the Delphi method and risk level matrix analysis were combined to evaluate the risk level of Crimea-Congo hemorrhagic fever(CCHF)and tick-borne encephalitis(TBE)imported into China from Russian and Kazakhstan by selecting 20 experts who have been engaged in the prevention and control of infectious diseases for a long time to fill in the questionnaire. Results of the second round consultation showed that the standard deviation of imported possibility(P),consequence severity(S)of two diseases from two counties were smaller than those in the first round,suggesting that the divergence of opinions of experts was narrowed. The CCHF imported possibility of Kazakhstan in the second round of consultation was significantly smaller than that in the first round(P=0.017),and the mean values of other indicators' scores were not higher than those in the first round,indicating that the risk preference did not increase with the increasing times of consultation. Kendall's W coefficient in the second round was 0.223,slightly higher than that in the first round. The risk levels of two tick-borne diseases in the second round from the risk level matrix in the two countries are in the range of low to medium,which tended to be concentrated compared to the first round( low to extremely high),and the mean rank of risk level in matrix of CCHF imported possibility from Kazakhstan in the second round was lower than that of the first round(P=0.027)and there was no significant difference in other indicators;the possibilities of TBE imported from Russia to China in two rounds were higher than those from Kazakhstan( Pround 1=0.008,Pround 2<0.001),mean rank of risk level in matrix of TBE in Russian in the second round was higher than that of Kazakhstan. Because the above results had already played the role in practical work and research methods,the consultation was terminated. This study suggests that although the imported possibility of TBE and CCHF faced by China from Russian and Kazakhstan is not up to a high level,we still need to keep a moderate vigilance.

参考文献

[1]尹璐.中国与丝绸之路沿线国家贸易互补性和竞争性研究-以俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦、阿联酋为例[D].北京:国际贸易研修学院,2014.

[2]牛丹丹,李洁,蒋涛,韩桃利,王英.中国倡导的“丝绸之路经济带”沿线五个国家病毒性传染病流行概况分析[J/OL].病毒学报,2019,35(5):777-800.DOI:10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.003592

[3]陆永昌,张家祝,张明江,陆永贵,丁永健.虫媒传染病风险评估指标体系建立的研究[J].旅游医学科学,2004,10(4):3-6.

[4]王亚丽,王煊,任瑞琦,周蕾,涂文校,倪大新,李群,冯子健,张彦平.中国2013-2016年境外输入传染病的流行病学特征[J].中华流行病学杂志,2017,38(11):1499-1503.

[5]对外投资合作国别(地区)指南俄罗斯(2018年版)[S].2018.https://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/wcm.files/upload/CMSydylgw/201902/201902010513054.pdf

[6]对外投资合作国别(地区)指南哈萨克斯坦(2018年版)[S].2018.https://www.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/wcm.files/upload/CMSydylgw/201902/201902010511040.pdf

[7]赵风源,丁鹏,邵柏.青岛大港口岸马达加斯加共和国鼠疫疫情输入风险评估[J].口岸卫生控制,2017,22(6):45-47.

[8]Butenko A M,Karganova G G.Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Russia and other countries of the Former Soviet Union[J].Butenko And Karganova,2007:99-114.

[9]Nurmakhanov T,Sansyzbaev Y,Atshabar B,Deryabin P,Kazakov S,Zholshorinov A,Matzhanova A,Sadvakassova A,Saylaubekuly R,Kyraubaev K,Hay J,Atkinson B,Hewson R.Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in Kazakhstan(1948-2013)[J].Int J Infect Dis,2015,38:19-23.

[10]孙素荣,孟卫卫,张渝疆.克里米亚-刚果出血热相关生物学研究进展[J].中华流行病学杂志,2011,32(7):727-732.

[11]Pshenichnaya N Y,Leblebicioglu H,Bozkurt I,Sannikova I V,Abuova G N,Zhuravlev A S,Barut S,Shermetova M B,Fletcher T E.Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in pregnancy:A systematic reviewand case series from Russia,Kazakhstan and Turkey[J].Int J Infect Dis,2017,58:58-64.

[12]Ruzek D,Avsic Zupanc T,Borde J,Chrdle A,Eyer L,Karganova G,Kholodilov I,Knap N,Kozlovskaya L,Matveev A,Miller A D,Osolodkin D I,Overby AK,Tikunova N,Tkachev S,Zajkowska J.Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe and Russia:Review of pathogenesis,clinical features,therapy,and vaccines[J].Antiviral Res,2019,164:23-51.

[13]郭刚,吴熙然,王郁,姚华.哈萨克斯坦病媒生物性疾病[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2015,38(4):289-292.

[14]http://www.chinacdc.cn/tjsj/fdcrbbg/.

[15]周李承,吕志平,李政良,黄志勇,韩颖.国境卫生检疫服务“一带一路”战略的策略与措施探讨[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2016,39(6):426-429.

[16]邓晓婷,陈冠林,黄莹偲,储大可,高永清.突发公共卫生事件风险评估方法[J].中国预防医学杂志,15(3):285-287.

[17]曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用(M).北京医科大学:中国协和医科大学联合出版,1994.

[18]李玲玲,江震,宋炜路,丁盈盈,徐杰,何纳.应用德尔菲法构建男男性行为者个体HIV感染风险评估工具[J].中华流行病学杂志,2017,38(10):1426-1430.

[19]李洪兴,罗庆,张荣,陶勇.肯德尔和谐系数W检验及程序实现[J].中国医院统计,2013,20(3):170-173.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.003764

中图分类号:R184.3

引用信息:

[1]王媛,韩桃利,王英.采用风险矩阵评估俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦两种蜱传病毒性传染病输入我国风险水平[J].病毒学报,2020,36(05):865-870.DOI:10.13242/j.cnki.bingduxuebao.003764.

基金信息:

国家科技重大专项课题(项目号:2018ZX10101002-003-004),题目:俄罗斯、中亚西亚重要传染病输入和监测预警技术研究~~

投稿时间:

2020-01-15

投稿日期(年):

2020

修回时间:

2020-03-08

终审时间:

2020-06-24

终审日期(年):

2020

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2020-06-24

出版时间:

2020-06-24

网络发布时间:

2020-06-24

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文